0

Werner Miller Magic

Published on Sunday, July 31, 2011 in , , , ,

Werner Miller's Ghost Rider effectGrey Matters favorite Werner Miller is back, and he's brought more of his amazing mathematical wizardry with him!

If you're not already familiar with him, he's a retired mathematics teacher in Germany who has created some of the most original and compelling magic routines I've ever come across. He is the author of several magic books, including Ear-Marked, which is available in the Grey Matters store.

Starting off, we have a couple of good routines that are perfect as promotional tools, since you can print them on your business cards or brochures, and have people perform them for themselves or others without understanding how they work. There's Vive Le Roi!, which includes several variations of routines where you move your finger from card to card, eventually winding up on a predicted card. You can have two people do this together, as they'll be on different cards until the last card.

The other trick along this line is Magic Patchwork, a similar trick with a magic square. He mentions that it was inspired by Pedro Alegria’s El cuadro de colores, but the link given is no longer functioning. Fortunately, it was captured by the web archive. The original is here, with a translation to English via Google Translate available here.

Werner Miller also created a very sneaky calculator trick, called You Push the Button... that seems to be a mathematical trick, but isn't. The use of the calculator helps conceal the outright sneaky method.

Getting back to his specialty of mathematical magic, he offers a great routine with dice. It's called Lined Up, and has two different phases, both of which begin with different-colored dice arranged with the numbers 1 through 6 in numerical order. In Phase 1, you have someone choose a die and turn that number face down. After getting the new total of these dice, you announce which color die has been turned over. Phase 2 is similar, except that you have someone choose a die and turn over every die EXCEPT for the chosen one!

I've saved my favorite for last! It's called Ghost Rider, and uses a chess knight and some file cards. One of the file cards is signed, then mixed into the pile and dealt out into a 3 by 3 square. The spectator then uses the knight and their own free choices to find their own signed card! Part of the principle is taught here on Grey Matters in my Knight Shift post, as mentioned generously in Werner Miller's article. His added touches, however, make this a very impressive trick.

If you like Werner Miller's style and would like to see more, check out the rest of Werner Miller's work here on Grey Matters!

0

5-Person Mind Reading!

Published on Thursday, July 28, 2011 in , , , , ,

Scam School logoIf I asked you to imagine a mathematical card trick, you'd probably picture some monstrosity such as the old 21-card trick.

However, mathematics isn't just about numbers, it's about patterns. This week, Scam School taught a 5-person mind-reading trick that demonstrates this point dramatically.

The trick in the following video is so amazing, one of the spectators refers to it as a Criss Angel-type trick. First, let's watch and learn the trick itself:



Brian gives a good explanation of the trick itself, but it's still not easy to see why the trick itself works. Fortunately, our old friend James Grime had previously posted a video on this same trick. This is a very clear explanation, aided by the use of different colored sheets to stand in for the separate cards:



In a trick like this, it's very important to understand the underlying principle clearly. This way, you're can allow the cards to be handled more freely while still understanding what types of mixing will ruin the trick, and what types won't affect the stack. For example, when Brian Brushwood took the cards back, he made sure to reverse each person's individual pile, but in a manner that made it seem like random mixing.

Notice that Brian keeps the focus on poker terminology, outright referring to each of the piles as hands. This is excellent psychology, as it helps put your audience in a mindset that you're some sort of master poker cheat with a penchant for telling on which cards people focus.

As I mentioned earlier, this is a mathematical card trick, not in the number sense, but rather in the sense that you're taking advantage of a simple pattern. In fact, the pattern is so simple, that's why putting the focus elsewhere, such as on a poker theme, is important.

This type of simplicity, as I've discussed before, is often difficult to achieve. When it's achieved, though, the results are rarely less than remarkable.

0

Photographic Memory

Published on Sunday, July 24, 2011 in , , , , ,

60 Minutes' eidetic memory report The holy grail of memory is considered to be eidetic memory, what is more commonly as known as a photographic memory.

Currently, there's plenty of skepticism about it. That's largely because there's so little scientific study about it, coupled with the rarity of finding anyone who truly has it. Fortunately, that's all starting to change.

If you've spent more than 5 minutes reading Grey Matters, you realize that there are many clever ways to simulate a great memory, and even to use a trained memory to appear to be far better than the true credit it deserves.

We'll start with a 2010 National Geographic story about Gianni Golfera. He's being studied by researchers because of his extraordinary memory abilities. However, he has also learned, created, and taught memory systems that anyone can use, so there's a question of just how much of his memory is due to biology and how much is due to practice and determination.



More recently, it's been discovered that there is a specific type of enhanced memory, called “hyperthymestic syndrome”, or less technically, “superior autobiographical memory”, that may be at the heart of this unusual phenomena. I mentioned this briefly back in 2008 on my post about Jill Price.

In that same post, I also mentioned that Taxi star Marilu Henner is also hyperthymestic. Late last year, she appeared in a 60 Minutes report about superior autobiographical memory with some others with the same condition.

This is worth watching, because it's a more detailed account of the condition, the people who have it, and the state of the current research about this little-understood phenomenon:


Along with the main report, CBS also posted two short bonus footage segments. In the first, Lesley Stahl puts Louise Owen's memory to the test, and in the second, Marilu Henner compares the experience of having such a remarkable memory to time traveling.

As someone interested in memory, even though my own interest is largely in entertainment, I do believe this research could prove to be quite interesting. If you have any thoughts or experiences you'd like to share about this unique form of memory, I'd love to hear about it in the comments.

0

Free Memory Web Apps

Published on Thursday, July 21, 2011 in , , ,

Think-A-Link logoLast week I introduced the updated version of Verbatim. It's a free web app to help you with memorization that doesn't require any registration.

Are there any other such web apps? Yes, and we'll cover many of them in this post.

While all the web apps below can be used without registration, some of them do offer extra functionality if you do register. In those cases, registration itself is also free.

Pinfruit: If you're familiar with the Peg/Major System, as described in Pinfruit's own user guide and in Grey Matters' Memory Basics post, then you'll find this web app to be a handy tool. It helps you remember numbers by translating them into words using the Peg/Major system.

MemorizeNow: Out of all the web apps on this list, this is probably the closest to Verbatim. You paste in the text you wish to remember, save it, and you're quizzed by either first letters or a fill-in-the-blank quiz. The video below shows you Memorize Now in more detail:




Think-A-Link: This may not be as interactive as many of the other web apps here, but is hard to pass over when talking about memory. This site has many fun and original links for just about every subject you can think of, and even a few that you can't. The best links from this site have even been collected in the book, Think of a Link.:




JogLab: JogLab focuses on help you remember lists with acrostic mnemonics. Acrostic mnemonics are those where you remember a silly phrase or poem to remember another set of information, such as “Richard of York gave battle in vain” for the colors of the rainbow, or “Every good boy does fine” for the remembering the notes for the main lines of the treble clef in music. JobLab helps you develop your own mnemonics with a very simple interface:




Verbatim 2: OK, forgive the shameless plug, but I couldn't resist adding my own program to the list for those who don't already know about it. Verbatim is a web app for memorizing text, similar to MemorizeNow above, but takes a different and more detailed approach:




Don't forget, too, that these and many other fine memory tools are always available by clicking the MEMORY TOOLS button at the top bar of any page on Grey Matters.

0

New Trig Function Tutorial

Published on Sunday, July 17, 2011 in , , ,

Jim Belk's unit circle illustrationOver in the Mental Gym, there's a tutorial all about the unit circle, which I published back in February. It focuses mainly on radians, Pi, sine and cosine.

I've had a few e-mails asking how to understand the other trigonometric functions: tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant. As of today, that new tutorial is up - Unit Circle 2: Trig Functions.

As suggested on the first page of the new tutorial, you should read and understand the original unit circle tutorial first.

In high school trigonometry, most people are told they'll really only need to know about sine and cosine, and a little bit about tangent. The formulas are explained, but never really their nature. It's one thing to be able to get the answer, and quite another to understand what the answer means.

My goal in the new tutorial was to be clear about the whats and whys of the other trig functions. You may never use them, but if you understand them, you'll quickly recognize when you can potentially use them.

Once you understand what each function covers, I lock in the important points of each function with mnemonics. Sure, you've probably run across SOHCAHTOA, but I've got a less familiar mnemonic covering all 6 functions that will have you saying “OOH! AAH!”.

Thanks to my recent experiences with Wolfram|Alpha, links to their knowledge engine were used in several examples. I only wish I'd known about Wolfram|Alpha sooner!

Considering the number of books and articles through which I had to look to develop these descriptions, I do believe that this new tutorial presents tangents, cotangents, secants, and cosecants in a way that's among the clearest out there.

If you have any further suggestions about the clarity of this tutorial (or anything else on Grey Matters), or have any questions about something that could be presented more clearly, let me know in the comments!

19

Verbatim 2: Free Web App

Published on Thursday, July 14, 2011 in , , , , , , ,

Verbatim 2 screenshot2 years ago, I released a free iPhone/iPod Touch web app called Verbatim, which was designed to help you memorize texts of any lengths word-for-word, such as monologues, poems, presentations, scripture, scripts, song lyrics, and speeches.

After hearing the feedback to the previous version, today I'm announcing the release of Verbatim 2.0! Yes, it's still free. Now it's easier than ever to use, and available for a wider array of mobile devices.

Verbatim was inspired by J. J. Hayes' post, How To Memorize A Poem. It's a brief article, but the I've found the technique to be very effective.

The most frequent complaint about the previous version was the requirement that a custom file had to be prepared and hosted remotely for it to work. In the new version, I've done away with that completely. Now, entering the piece is as simple as cutting and pasting.

The need to access the remote file also created a second obstacle, you had to have an online connection for it to work. Thanks to the new method of entering the text, as well as a few other programming techniqes, Verbatim 2 is completely self-contained and can now be used offline! It never needs to access any other files from anywhere, and only requires online access if you desire to visit the links in the manual.

The simplest way to use Verbatim offline is to download it from the above link, put it in your Dropbox account, sync up your mobile device's Dropbox app, and then run Verbatim in the app. I've only tried this myself in iOS devices, but it should work in a wide variety of mobile devices.

The following video will give you a more complete look at the updated version of Verbatim:



You can download an MPEG4 version of this video for offline viewing at: http://tinyurl.com/v2video

Verbatim was completely re-written in jQuery Mobile 1.0 beta 1, so that a wider array of mobile devices and desktops could run it. Many of the supported platforms are mentioned in the video tutorial above, and in the manual, with more detailed information available about supported platforms here.

If you're inspired to start memorizing a piece of text, there's plenty of good starting points in the related resources page of the manual. There's also many good poetry posts right here on Grey Matters. I've tried to cover different styles, from classic to modern to funny, and just downright bizarre.

I'd love to hear if Verbatim helps you, as well as answer any questions, problems, and suggestions in the comments.

0

Yet Still More Quick Snippets

Published on Sunday, July 10, 2011 in , , , , ,

Luc Viatour's plasma lamp pictureJuly's snippets are here, and they're full of free mathematical goodies!

• Marcus du Sautoy, whom you may remember from his BBC series, The Story of Maths, has definitely been keeping busy. Besides that documentary, you can find his 10-part podcast series A Brief History of Mathematics available for free via the BBC (or, strangely, as an audiobook for sale). This is a great introduction to the giants of mathematical history.

You can also see him lecture for free about symmetry on TED, or about prime numbers at Hebrew University (via YouTube).

• I've talked about game theory recently, yet I only recently ran across a great tool for studying it. Gambit is a free game theory analysis program that runs on Windows, OS X, and Linux. There are two excellent and simple tutorials available on the site (available as both Flash movies and PDF documents) to get you started. It makes a wonderful companion tool to game theory courses, such as Game Theory 101 (free via YouTube), Ben Polak's Game Theory course at Yale (free via Yale, YouTube, or iTunes, course documents available at Yale link). I first learned about this while watching The Teaching Company's game theory course, Games People Play, which is also an excellent introduction to the field.

• Speaking of unusual calculators, iOS mobile device users should check out the free Magical Calculator app. Instead of just being a standard calculator app, you can prepare it with your own custom formulas and inputs (such as those for interest on loans or physics equations), and then you'll always have your own handy custom calculator ready! If you're familiar with InstaCalc website from BetterExplained, this is basically the same idea turned into an app.

Speaking of freebies, I'll have a very special one (non-mathematical) for you in Thursday's post!

0

The Wolfram|Alpha Trick

Published on Thursday, July 07, 2011 in , , , , ,

KSmrq's quadratic equation pictureEver do one of those tricks where you have someone pick a number, and have them do things like add 5, double it, subtract 4, divide by 2, subtract their original number, and you determine that the answer they got was 3?

As many people realize when you're doing such a trick, the whole process boils down to an algebraic formula that applies to any number. Today, we're going to turn that process on its head by figuring out a formula secretly chosen by your audience!

After being shown the following math trick by W. W. Sawyer, Martin Gardner wrote it up in his books, New Mathematical Diversions and The Colossal Book of Mathematics.

Here's the original write-up, in Martin Gardner's words:

Instead of asking someone to “think of a number” you ask him to “think of a formula.” To make the trick easy, it should be a quadratic formula (a formula containing no powers of x greater than x2). Suppose that he thinks of 5x2 + 3x - 7. While your back is turned so that you cannot see his calculations, ask him to subtitute 0, 1, and 2 for x, then tell you the three values that result for the entire expression. The values he gives you are -7, 1, 19. After a bit of scribbling (with practice you can do it in your head) you tell him the original formula!

The method is simple. Jot down in a row the value he gives to you. In a row beneath write the differences between adjacent pairs of numbers, always subtracting the number on the left from its neighbor on the right. In a third row put the difference between the numbers above it. The chart will look like this:



The coefficient of x2, in the thought-of formula, is always half the bottom number of the chart. The coefficient of x is obtained by taking half the bottom number from the first number of the middle row. And the constant in the formula is simply the first number of the top row.

When this was originally published in the 1960s, I can't imagine this trick seeing much action outside of college math classes. You probably wouldn't expect that to change.

As so often happens, technology is at the point now where this trick is actually feasible for a much wider audience. If you have a pen or pencil, some paper, and a volunteer with a smartphone or tablet connected to the internet, you can do this trick just about anywhere, even for people who don't do math! The use of a mobile internet device means you don't have to turn your back on your audience at any time, since they can just hold the device facing themselves.

You could begin by talking about algebraic tricks like the one at the beginning of this post, and then explain that you're going to attempt to find a formula they create, instead.

Have them connect to www.wolframalpha.com (Wolfram|Alpha). If you're not already familiar with it, here's a video introduction to it by the inventor, Stephen Wolfram (Part 2 is here).

Start by asking your volunteer to choose a number from 1 to 20, and asking him to enter that number into the Wolfram|Alpha search box followed by xx. For example, if he chose 5, he would enter 5xx.

(Side note: Yes, Wolfram|Alpha will also take x^2 to mean the same thing, but entering xx only requires two characters to enter and doesn't slow down the presentation while they hunt for the ^ character.)

Next, ask them to enter a plus or minus symbol, followed by a different number of their choice from 1 to 20, followed by a single x this time. Finally, ask them to choose a plus or minus symbol again, ending with one more different number from 1 to 20.

Let's say they entered the equation from Martin Gardner's example above, as 5xx + 3x - 7. Tell them to click the = button on the Wolfram|Alpha search engine, where they should see something like this. Explain that, at this point, they should see graphs of the equation, along with things such as alternate forms of the equations, derivatives, and more!

Having them see all this information actually achieves two important things. First, it gives a visually dramatic idea of the complexity of the equation they've entered, making this feat seem much harder. Second, it also lets you know that they've entered the formula correctly, without you having to see it.

Wolfram|Alpha also makes the substitution part of the trick easy. Have them go back up to the search bar, making sure not to erase any part of the original equation they entered, and place the cursor after the equation. By having them add ,x=0 (note the comma) and clicking equals again, they'll see a much simpler page like this.

Have them give you the resulting answer, and then to do the same for x=1 and for x=2. Write them down, and figure out the original formula in the manner described above by Martin Gardner.

As you can see, the development of the internet, mobile wireless internet devices, and Wolfram|Alpha make a big difference in your potential audience for this math trick.

The internet even makes practicing this trick easy. You can use sites like random.org to generate random practice numbers from which to work out an equation, and use Wolfram|Alpha to see if you're right. You should stick to number sets where the leftmost and rightmost numbers are both odd or both even, so that you'll always be working with whole numbers.

If you're curious about the principle behind this routine, check out the Martin Gardner books I mentioned. Over in the Mental Gym, the same principle is used to determine a bill's serial number.

0

The Secrets of Nim (Dice Nim 2)

Published on Sunday, July 03, 2011 in , , ,

NIM is WIN upside down!(NOTE: Check out the other posts in The Secrets of Nim series.)

We're going to continue the discussion of the game 31 from the previous post, so make sure you've read that post first!

Just so we have them handy in this post, we'll go over the winning strategies for 31 once again:

  • Ask yourself: “Can I rotate the die so as to get to a running total with a digital root of 4 (4, 13, 22, or 31)?” If so, do it! If not...
  • ...Ask yourself, “Could I rotate the die to a 3 or a 4, so as to get to a running total with a digital root of 1, 5, or 9 (1, 5, 9, 10, 14, 18, 19, 23, 27, or 28)?” If so, do it! If not...
  • ...rotate the die to a 2 or a 5, so as to obtain a running total with a digital root of 8 (8, 17, or 26). Assuming the other player hasn't purposely or accidentally made a good move, this one will still be possible.
When charted out against every number from 4 to 31, here's how the strategies appear:

Running Total Digital Root Reached via... Running Total Digital Root Reached via...
4 4 Any Number 18 9 3 or 4
5 5 3 or 4 19 1 3 or 4
6 6 Avoid 20 2 Avoid
7 7 Avoid 21 3 Avoid
8 8 2 or 5 22 4 Any Number
9 9 3 or 4 23 5 3 or 4
10 1 3 or 4 24 6 Avoid
11 2 Avoid 25 7 Avoid
12 3 Avoid 26 8 2 or 5
13 4 Any Number 27 9 3 or 4
14 5 3 or 4 28 1 3 or 4
15 6 Avoid 29 2 Avoid
16 7 Avoid 30 3 Avoid
17 8 2 or 5 31 4 Any Number

The “Running Total” and “Digital Root” columns should be understandable, assuming you read my previous post. The “Reached via...” column lists the only numbers you should use in attaining the corresponding running total.

Other Totals?

What if someone suggests playing with a total other than 31? First, you could simply get lucky and they could choose a total whose digital root is also 4, such as 40, 49, 58, or so on. In that case, the strategy doesn't change at all (except for possibly more primary key numbers).

On the other hand, you may be up against, say, a Douglas Adams fan who is bound and determined to play to 42 (whose digital root is 6). Well, you could analyze the game for all of the digital roots from 1 to 9, and memorize 9 distinct strategies (and I could probably teach you how ;), but there's an easier way.

Once the goal total is chosen, look for the next number after that whose digital root is 4. In our 42 example, the next number above that with a digital root of 4 is 49 (49 → 4 + 9 = 13 → 1 + 3 = 4). The important thing to take note of here is how far above the target number this is. In our 42 example, we'd subtract 49 - 42 to get 7. 7 is the number you want to remember. We'll refer to this as your “adjustment number”.

From here, whenever you're considering your strategy, you simply take the actual running total, and mentally add your adjustment number before considering any strategies. In effect, you're secretly playing to another number with a digital root of 4, but the other player is unaware of this.

Let's try our sample game which being played to 42, in which you go first against another player. You work out, as above, that the next “4” number is 49, and do 49 - 42 to get 7. Since you're moving first and the running total is effectively 0, you think to yourself “0 + 7 = 7”, giving you a “secret running total” of 7. Obviously, choosing 6 here is the best best, as it gives you the total of 13, so you set start with 6. The real running total is 6, even though your secret running total says otherwise.

Say the other player rotates the die a quarter turn to 2 (Real running total: 6 + 2 = 8). Before you move, you mental add 7 to the real running total, giving you a secret running total of 15. Let's see, you can't get to 22 from 15, so how about adding 3 to get to 18 (digital root=9)! You rotate to the 3, so the real running total is now 11 (8 + 3 = 11).

The game continues on in this manner, with you adding your secret adjustment number to the real running total each time. If you played the original version of 31 enough to be familiar with the strategy, then you only need to get used to adding the adjustment number to the real running total each time, and you'll consistently win!

It's probably a good idea to keep the real running total on a piece of paper. Not only will this give you something to glance at when adding your adjustment number on your move, but it also minimizes and settles any disputes about the score.

Analysis

The question you may have now is how the strategy was developed. Not surprisingly, it's tricky to analyze. Back in 2008, these chess players tried analyzing the original 31 game, but never got as far as stating the strategy as clearly as above. Note, however, that they quickly picked up on the importance of 4, 13, 22, and 31.

If you're really interested in seeing how the strategy develops, there is a fun project you can try for yourself that also meshes nicely with the principles in my recent Iteration, Feedback, and Change series. I'll describe the craft version below, but if you're into computer programming, you could read through the process below and write it as a program instead.

Craft Project/Computer Program

Back in 2008, I wrote about Hexapawn, a 2-player game on a 3 by 3 chessboard, played only with 3 black pawns and 3 white pawns. The game itself is short and easy to master. The major point of the game was that you could build a simple array with matchboxes and counters (beads, coins, colored candies, etc.) that could not only play against you, but learn to win the game! Here's the original description by Martin Gardner, detailing how the matchbox array is prepared and used. For those interested in doing a computer program version, here's a BASIC listing to inspire you, including a sample run.

You can adapt this matchbox project quite easily to 31. For the dice game version, you'll also need 22 matchboxes, and counters in 6 different colors. You should have 16 counters in each of the 6 colors, for a total of 96 counters. You'll need to decide which color represents which number. For example, you might decide that red=1, blue=2, green=3, orange=4, white=5, and black=6.

On 1 of the matchboxes, you're going to write “Move 1”. On 3 of the matchboxes, you're going to write “Move 3”. You'll also write “Move 5” on a different set of 3 matchboxes, and the same for “Move 7”, “Move 9”, “Move 11”, “Move 13”, and “Move 15”.

In the single “Move 1” box, you're going to place counters of all 6 colors. This represents the fact that the matchbox array, which will always go first, can start the game by choosing any of the 6 numbers on the dice.

On one of the “Move 3” boxes write “1 or 6 on top”, an only put in the counters with colors representing 2, 3, 4, and 5 in that box. Do the same for one of the “Move 5” boxes, one of the “Move 7” boxes, and so on. On another “Move 3” box, write “2 or 5 on top”, and only include the counters representing the numbers 1, 3, 4, and 6 in that box. Again, do the same for one of the “Move 5” boxes, one of the “Move 7” boxes, and so on. Finally, mark all the remaining empty boxes, write “3 or 4 on top”, and only include counters representing the numbers 1, 2, 5, and 6 in those boxes.

Note that there's only a single move 1 box, as any number can be chosen on the first move. Each of the other moves has 3 boxes, because there are 3 different possibilities on each of the remaining moves. From this starting point, play is similar to the Hexapawn game described above, except that the matchbox array always goes first.

Playing Against the Matchboxes

To start the game, pick up the game marked “Move 1” shake it, and draw out a color at random. Close the matchbox and set the chosen counter on top of the “Move 1” box, setting the die according to the color, and have that be the starting total. Next, you make move 2 by giving the die a quarter turn in any direction and adding that to the running total. Feel free to use the strategies you learned above to try and win.

After that, it's time for the computer to play move 3, so look at the die, note the number on the top, and pick up the corresponding “Move 3” box. For example, if you left a 5 on top when you made move 2, then you'd pick up the box marked “Move 3, 2 or 5 on top”, and choose a counter randomly from that box. Again, set the counter on top of the box from which you chose it, rotate the die as needed, add the amount to the running total, and continue the game until you or the matchbox wins.

Since the matchbox array is playing randomly, and you're playing with an effective strategy, you'll more than likely win this first game. Here comes the interesting part: If the matchbox array loses a game, punish it by permanently removing all the counters which are sitting on top of the boxes. If the matchbox array wins the game instead, reward it by placing each of the counters back into their corresponding boxes. Now, play the game again.

Playing Repeatedly

If you play the game against the matchbox array repeatedly, punishing it and rewarding as described above, you'll notice that the matchboxes get better and better at playing the game! Don't be surprised if the matchbox array eventually becomes unbeatable. Because you're employing the processes we talked about in the Iteration, Feedback, and Change series, you'll note that the remaining stones allow the game to “survive” more effectively in the context of the game.